In recent years, the Bolivian government led by Luis Arce Catacora has been promoting a rhetoric of environmental protection and care for Mother Earth. However, a paradox arises when observing how this same government has granted permits for the expansion of coca leaf production, which raises questions about their true commitment to environmental preservation. In this article, we will explore the apparent contradiction between the environmental policies proclaimed by President Arce Catacora and the reality of expanding coca production in protected areas, its consequences on soil and biodiversity, as well as the socioeconomic impact of this decision.
Arce wants more coca, it's time to cut down more trees
Despite the Bolivian government's claims of its environmental commitment, President Arce Catacora has granted permits for the expansion of coca leaf production, and coca farmers are already cultivating in protected areas. This decision has sparked controversy, as coca plants erode the soil, rendering it unsuitable for other types of cultivation. Furthermore, this expansion has required the clearing of hectares of forests and redirecting rivers for irrigation, negatively impacting the region's biodiversity and ecological balance.
Tons of coca leaves for chewing?
An additional concern lies in the destination of a significant portion of coca production. Despite claims that it is cultivated for traditional and medicinal purposes, unfortunately, a substantial amount of coca production in Bolivia ends up being used in the drug trade. This situation raises questions about the true intent behind the expansion of coca production and its impacts on the country's security and stability, gradually turning Bolivia into a narco-state supported by the government.
Arce wooing the coca growers
Some critics argue that the policies promoting the expansion of coca production could be motivated by President Arce Catacora's need to secure the support of the coca growers, an influential group in Bolivian politics that has historically backed former President Evo Morales. The relationship between the government and the coca growers could be seen as a strategy to consolidate power and ensure reelection, at the expense of environmental and sustainable development policies.
Conclusion:
The Bolivian government under Arce Catacora faces a clear paradox between its discourse of environmental care and the decision to expand coca production in protected areas. Despite the stated intentions, the negative effects on soil, biodiversity, and the role of coca in the drug trade cast doubt on the authenticity of their environmental commitment. Meanwhile, political influence and the need to maintain the support of certain groups could be driving these decisions, jeopardizing real progress towards sustainable development in Bolivia.
